Book Drunkard

“I am simply a 'book drunkard.' Books have the same irresistible temptation for me that liquor has for its devotee. I cannot withstand them.” L.M. Montgomery

Stephanie Cowell Guest Post


I’m thrilled to welcome Stephanie Cowell, author of Claude & Camille to my blog today.  It’s been a dream working with her as not only is she very talented, she’s a super nice person.  I enjoyed the new book thoroughly and my review (as well as a giveaway) will be posted tomorrow.


How do you write an historical novel? Slowly, like building and furnishing a house.

I ask myself this question each time I begin writing a new novel. I look at other writers and sigh and say, “How do they do that?” I think some people write straight through though I believe these writers are rare. I have a fantasy one should start with Chapter I and write on in a neat, coherent way until the words The End. But that doesn’t happen to me.

I once saw a typeset page of one of Balzac’s novels. His revisions and insertions in ink came to twice the total of typeset words and none were legible.

There are two types of writers: plot driven and character drive. The plot driven ones think of the plot first and the others (of which I am one) fall in love with characters and then try to come up with a sequence of events of what I call a rising plot line. This is where I start pulling out my hair and throwing it around the house.

There is a saying that novels are rewritten more than they are written. For me that is the case. There is also the wisdom that you can wait forever to find the perfect place for a particular sentence. And the frustrating and wonderful thing is when the novel is done, it seems as if it has fallen from heaven to the page, and you look back and can’t figure out why it ever took you so long.

For me the hard part isn’t the research. In fact I generally cut out 95% of my research in the final draft. I wrote a novel set in the ancient world once (still unfinished) which had so much history and what they drank and ate and wore that you had to get shovel to find the plot.

Novels are not so much written as sculpted or molded from thousands of different things: history, a real character, a feeling you had when your mother left you when you were six, something you always longed for, a blue dress, a young man with dark eyes, a war, a dream. Then you combine hair styles, warm ale for breakfast, cobbled streets and so on. Thousands of things somehow finally come together in a plot line and become a novel.

I think I wrote my last novel CLAUDE & CAMILLE about ten times at least. I wasn’t sure how I wanted to tell the story. I had fallen in love with Claude Monet’s works from his twenties when no one wanted his art (a critic called it a bad design for wallpaper) and I knew I wanted it to be about his growing into a painter, and his great love Camille who he lost, and his strong friendships with the other painters, especially his best friend Frédéric. It wasn’t until I decided to do it from the time when he was old and painting his water lily garden at Giverny ― asking himself questions about this girl he had loved so much when he was young and his friends back then who would become the impressionists —that it found its center.  And a lot of the scenes had to be cut, dozens of them. I worked very hard with my editor and the book finally found its shape.

Someone once wrote, “There are three rules for writing a novel; unfortunately, no one knows what they are.” Each novel has its own shape and problems and strengths, just like each person. As a historical novelist, I think you just find a period you adore and some characters who won’t leave you alone and have faith that you will bring everything together eventually into a wonderful story.

10 thoughts on “Stephanie Cowell Guest Post

  1. Great post, Stephanie. Sounds like you and I write (and rewrite) in much the same way. I could never write a completely plot driven book. I have to know and love (and sometimes hate) my characters too much to allow for that.

    Claude and Camille did read as though it were effortless, so I gathered there was a tremendous amount of work behind every scene.

  2. What a wonderful post, I want to read it again. Thank you. Can’t wait to read the book.

  3. This is so interesting. As a blogger, I have often wondered how anyone writes a chapter; a book seems completely impossible! I am always interested in reading about how writers write. Thanks for this post. I will be back to visit this blog more often! molly

  4. Dear Stephanie,

    I am really looking forward to reading your novel about Monet. I really loved your novel “Marrying Mozart” and still remember some of the details in your descriptions about the 4 Weber sisters who slept together in one room. I started life as a violinist, which is why that novel appealed to me so much. I agree with your assessment of the novel-writing process. I also, tend to fall in love with my characters, and then take a helter-skelter ride with them. My problem is also dealing with rising tension, and giving the reader a definite feeling that we are going somewhere. Thank you for your post.

  5. I can totally believe that writing is more about rewriting. You may start in one place, but then over time and through rewriting it changes completely. Thanks for the great guest post!

  6. Hello, Stephanie,

    Love your blog! Fun and funny … plus, it made me feel better about my own multiple rewrites!

    This sounds like an interesting book.

    Laura Davies Tilley

  7. Fantastic post, Stephanie. The last paragraph is something all writers of hf should take to heart and remember when all seems lost.

  8. Great guest post! I recently won Claude and Camille on the Wonders and Marvels blog and I can’t wait to read it! Thanks Stephanie for this insight on writing…any pointers are always a great help to us aspiring authors. 🙂

  9. I tend to write in scenes, but the story always starts with a character and what is happening to him/her. In historic novels, it’s the events and their time period that surrounds, but it’s the characters story and how they deal with that on an intimate scale is what drives the novel.

    I was fascinated with Monet’s life as a beginning artist and maritime environment that was a part of his boyhood. It helped to explain his love of the outdoors and how he painted.

  10. The correct grammar is: ‘an historic novel’ OR ‘a historic novel’? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s